Chapter 8: Trends in the Periodic Table
Section 8-2: Atomic and Ionic Radius
Section 8-3: Ionization Energy and Electron Affinity
Chapter 8 Practice Exercises and Review Quizzes
Section 8-1: Group Names
We will refer to particular groups
on the periodic table by their common names, including:
Group |
Name |
1 |
alkali metals (H not included) |
2 |
alkaline earth metals |
17 |
halogens |
18 |
noble gases |
Metals in the central region of the
periodic table are known as transition metals.
Section 8-2: Atomic and Ionic Radius
When comparing neutral atoms in the
same group of the periodic table, an atom having valence electrons with the
larger value of n will generally have the larger atomic radius. For example, let us compare the two
alkali metals lithium and sodium, which have the following electron
configurations:
Li: [He] 2s1
Na: [Ne] 3s1
Since the valence 3s electron in
sodium has the larger value of n than the valence 2s electron in lithium, we would
expect sodium to have the larger atomic radius.
Neutral atoms in the same row of
the periodic table do not have a difference in the value of n for the valence
electrons. For example, the
alkaline earth metal magnesium and the halogen chlorine in the third row both
have valence electrons with n = 3:
Mg: [Ne] 3s2
Cl:
[Ne] 3s2 3p5
When two atoms have the same value
of n for the valence electrons, the atom with the greater number of protons
will generally have a greater effective nuclear charge to draw the valence
electrons closer to the nucleus and, thus, decrease the atomic radius. Since chlorine's 17 protons are greater
than magnesium's 12 protons, chlorine will have a greater effective nuclear
charge to draw chlorine's valence electrons closer to the nucleus and, thus,
chlorine is expected to have the smaller atomic radius, while magnesium with
the lower effective nuclear charge is expected to have the larger atomic
radius.
Based on the discussion above, we
can draw the following conclusion regarding the trend on the periodic table for
atomic radius:
An element located closer to the lower left corner of the periodic table
will generally have the larger atomic radius, while an element located closer
to the upper right corner of the periodic table will generally have the smaller
atomic radius.
Note that there are numerous
exceptions to the trend above, particularly among the transition metals.
Sample Exercise 8A:
Rank the elements bromine, calcium,
and fluorine from smallest to largest atomic radius. Explain, including electron configurations in your answer.
Solution:
Based on the trend stated above, we
would expect F, which is closest to the upper right corner of the periodic
table, to have the smallest atomic radius and Ca, which is closest to the lower
left corner of the periodic table, to have the largest atomic radius. If we compare the electron
configurations of the two halogens Br and F, we see that Br should have the larger
atomic radius because Br's valence electrons have n = 4, whereas F should have
the smaller atomic radius because F's valence electrons have n = 2:
Br: [Ar] 4s2
3d10 4p5
F: [He] 2s2
2p5
If we compare the electron
configurations of Br and Ca, we see that both elements have valence electrons
with n = 4:
Ca: [Ar] 4s2
However, Br's 35 protons should
give Br a greater effective nuclear charge and smaller atomic radius, whereas
Ca's 20 protons should give Ca a lower effective nuclear charge and larger
atomic radius. Therefore, the
three elements ranked from smallest to largest atomic radius would be F < Br
< Ca.
When a neutral atom gains electrons to form a negatively-charged
anion, the ionic radius of the anion will be larger than the atomic radius of
the neutral atom.
The electrons added to make an
anion do not typically change the value of n for the valence electrons, so we
can attribute the increased radius of the anion to increased repulsion between
the negatively-charged electrons that then spread out
to increase the radius.
Sample Exercise 8B:
Which is larger, the atomic radius
of I or the ionic radius of I- ? Explain, including electron
configurations in your answer.
Solution:
The neutral atom I
and the anion I- have the following electron configurations:
I: [Kr] 5s2 4d10
5p5
I- : [Kr] 5s2 4d10 5p6
Both have valence electrons with n = 5, but the extra electron added to a 5p orbital in I- leads to
increased electron repulsion that causes the electrons to spread out more, thus
increasing the ionic radius of I- and making it larger than the
atomic radius of I.
When a neutral atom loses electrons to form a positively-charged
cation, the ionic radius of the cation
will be smaller than the atomic radius of the neutral atom.
In some cases, all the valence
electrons from the neutral atom will be removed to create a cation. As a result, the cation
will have a smaller radius than the neutral atom because the value of n for the
valence electrons in the neutral atom will be greater than the value of n for
any remaining electrons in the cation.
In other cases, not all the valence
electrons may be removed to create a cation, so the
value of n will be the same for the valence electrons in the neutral atom and
the remaining valence electrons in the cation. In these cases, we can attribute the
decreased radius of the cation to decreased electron
repulsion when electrons are removed, which allows the remaining electrons to
move closer together and decrease the radius.
Sample Exercise 8C:
(a) Which is larger, the atomic
radius of K or the ionic radius of K+ ? Explain, including electron configurations in your answer.
(b) Which is larger, the atomic
radius of Sn or the ionic radius of Sn2+
Solution:
(a) When the complete electron
configurations of K and K+ are compared, we see that the value of n = 4 for the valence 4s electron in K is greater than the value of n for any
remaining electrons in K+ :
K: 1s2 2s2 2p6
3s2 3p6 4s1 K+ :
1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6
Therefore, the atomic radius of K
will be larger than the ionic radius of K+.
(b) When the electron
configurations of Sn and Sn2+ are
compared, we see that both have valence electrons with n = 5:
Sn: [Kr] 5s2
4d10 5p2
Sn2+ : [Kr] 5s2 4d10
However, electron repulsion is
decreased when electrons are removed to create Sn2+, so the
remaining electrons in Sn2+ can move closer together to decrease the
radius of Sn2+.
Therefore, the atomic radius of Sn will be
larger than the ionic radius of Sn2+ .
Isoelectronic ions have the same number of electrons and identical electron
configurations. In a group of isoelectronic ions, the ion with the greatest
number of protons will have the greatest effective nuclear charge to draw the
valence electrons closer to the nucleus, thus making its ionic radius the smallest in
the group.
Sample Exercise 8D:
Rank Al3+, F-, Na+,
and O2- from smallest to largest ionic radius. Explain, including electron configurations in your answer.
Solution:
All are isoelectronic
with 10 electrons and a complete electron configuration of 1s2 2s2
2p6. More protons =
greater effective nuclear charge = smaller ionic radius, so from smallest to largest we have:
Al3+
(13 p) < Na+ (11 p) < F- (9 p) < O2- (8 p)
Section 8-3: Ionization Energy and Electron Affinity
First ionization energy (I1) is the amount of energy that must
be absorbed to remove one valence electron from a neutral gaseous atom to
create a cation with a 1+ charge. An element with a larger atomic radius
will generally have a lower first ionization energy. As such, we can draw the following conclusion regarding the
trend on the periodic table for first ionization energy:
An element located closer to the lower left corner of the periodic table
will generally have a lower first ionization energy, while an element located
closer to the upper right corner of the periodic table will generally have a
higher first ionization energy.
Sample Exercise 8E:
Rank the elements fluorine,
magnesium, and potassium from smallest to largest atomic radius and lowest to
highest first ionization energy.
Solution:
Closest to the upper right corner
of the periodic table = smallest atomic radius = highest first ionization energy. Therefore, from smallest to largest
atomic radius we have F < Mg < K, and from lowest to highest first
ionization energy we have the opposite order, K < Mg < F.
phosphorus:
↑ |
↑ |
↑ |
3p3
sulfur:
↑↓ |
↑ |
↑ |
3p4
In phosphorus, the electron removed is one of the unpaired 3p electrons. In sulfur, the electron removed is one of the paired 3p electrons. It is believed that electron repulsion between the paired 3p electrons in sulfur makes removal of one electron in the pair easier, which results in a lower first ionization energy for sulfur.
Second ionization energy (I2)
is the energy that must be absorbed to remove one electron from the 1+ cation that remains after the first valence electron is
removed from a neutral atom. Third
ionization energy (I3) is the energy that must be absorbed to remove
one electron from the 2+ cation
that remains after an electron is removed from a 1+ cation. Subsequent ionization energies are
labeled I4, I5, etc. Ionization energy increases each time an electron is removed
from an atom or ion:
I1
< I2 < I3 . . .
Ionization energy increases
gradually until all the valence electrons with the largest value of n are
removed, but then there will be an enormous jump in the ionization energy
required to remove the next, non-valence, electron from an (n – 1)
orbital. For example, since
silicon has the complete electron configuration 1s2 2s2 2p6
3s2 3p2, the ionization energies will increase gradually
from I1 through I4 as the two valence 3p and then the two
valence 3s electrons are removed.
However, I5 will then be enormous compared to I4
as the 5th electron removed from silicon comes from a non-valence 2p
orbital and, thus, requires a tremendous amount of energy for removal.
Sample Exercise 8F:
Explain the huge increase in
ionization energy between I3 and I4 for boron.
Solution:
Boron has the complete electron
configuration 1s2 2s2 2p1. The ionization energies will increase
gradually from I1 through I3 as the valence 2p and then
two valence 2s electrons are removed, but then I4 will be enormous
compared to I3 as the 4th electron removed from boron
comes from the non-valence 1s orbital and, thus, requires a huge amount of
energy for removal.
First electron affinity (EA1) is the energy associated with the process of adding one electron to a neutral gaseous atom to create an anion with a 1- charge. In general, it is more favorable to add an electron to an element with a smaller atomic radius, although there are numerous exceptions to this. For example, the addition of an electron to a noble gas is unfavorable.
Chapter 8 Practice Exercises and Review Quizzes:
8-1) Rank the elements beryllium,
nitrogen, and strontium from smallest to largest atomic radius. Explain, including electron configurations
in your answer.
Click for Solution
8-1)
Be: [He] 2s2
N: [He] 2s2
2p3
Sr:
[Kr] 5s2
N is closest to the upper right
corner of the periodic table, so N should have the smallest atomic radius. Sr is closest
to the lower left corner of the periodic table, so Sr
should have the largest atomic radius.
The valence 5s electrons in Sr have n = 5 as
compared to the valence 2s electrons in Be having n =
2, so Sr should have a larger atomic radius than
Be. Although both N and Be have valence electrons with n = 2, N has 7 protons as
compared to Be's 4 protons, so N will have a greater
effective nuclear charge and smaller atomic radius than Be. Therefore, the three elements ranked
from smallest to largest atomic radius would be N < Be < Sr.
8-2) Which is larger, the atomic
radius of S or the ionic radius of S2-? Explain, including electron
configurations in your answer.
Click for Solution
8-2) S: [Ne] 3s2 3p4
S2- : [Ne] 3s2 3p6
Both have valence electrons with n = 3, but the two extra electrons added to 3p orbitals
in S2- lead to increased electron repulsion that causes the
electrons to spread out more, thus increasing the ionic radius of S2-
and making it larger than the atomic radius of S.
8-3) (a)
Which is larger, the atomic radius of Sb or the ionic
radius of Sb3+ ?
Explain, including electron
configurations in your answer
(b) Which is larger, the atomic radius of Al or the ionic
radius of Al3+? Explain, including electron
configurations in your answer.
Click for Solution
8-3) (a) Sb: [Kr] 5s2
4d10 5p3
Sb3+ : [Kr] 5s2
4d10
Both have valence electrons with n = 5. However, electron repulsion
is decreased when electrons are removed to create Sb3+, so the
remaining electrons in Sb3+ can move closer together to decrease the
radius of Sb3+.
Therefore, the atomic radius of Sb will be
larger than the ionic radius of Sb3+.
(b) When the complete electron
configurations of Al and Al3+ are compared, we see that the value of
n = 3 for the valence electrons in Al is greater than the value of n for any
remaining electrons in Al3+ :
Al: 1s2 2s2 2p6
3s2 3p1 Al3+ : 1s2 2s2 2p6
Therefore, the atomic radius of Al
will be larger than the ionic radius of Al3+.
8-4) Rank Ca2+, Cl-, P3-,
and Sc3+ from smallest to largest ionic radius. Explain, including electron
configurations in your answer.
Click for Solution
8-4) All
are isoelectronic with 18 electrons and a complete
electron configuration of 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2
3p6. More protons =
greater effective nuclear charge = smaller ionic radius, so from smallest to largest
we have:
Sc3+
(21 p) < Ca2+(20 p) < Cl-
(17 p) < P3- (15 p)
8-5) Rank the elements calcium,
oxygen, and silicon from smallest to largest atomic radius and lowest to
highest first ionization energy.
Click for Solution
8-5) Closest to the upper right
corner of the periodic table = smallest atomic radius = highest first
ionization energy. Therefore, from
smallest to largest atomic radius we have O < Si < Ca, and from lowest to
highest first ionization energy we have the opposite order, Ca < Si < O.
Click for Solution
8-6) Phosphorus has the complete electron configuration 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p3. The ionization energies will increase gradually from I1 through I5 as the three valence 3p electrons and then two valence 3s electrons are removed, but then I6 will be enormous compared to I5 as the 6th electron removed from phosphorus comes from the non-valence 2p orbital and, thus, requires a huge amount of energy for removal.
Click for Solution
8-7) We can compare orbital diagrams showing the valence 2p electrons in nitrogen and oxygen to explain this exception:
nitrogen:
↑ |
↑ |
↑ |
2p3
oxygen:
↑↓ |
↑ |
↑ |
2p4
In nitrogen, the electron removed is one of the unpaired 2p electrons. In oxygen, the electron removed is one of the paired 2p electrons. It is believed that electron repulsion between the paired 2p electrons in oxygen makes removal of one electron in the pair easier, which results in a lower first ionization energy for oxygen.